Tag Archives: Conspiracy
Tags: B of A, Chase, child protection industry conspiracies, commercial bankers, conspiracies, Conspiracy, conspiracy theory, control and manipulate money system, create money out of nothing and collect interest on it, destiny of the people, Federal Reserve, Government, hidden power, industrial giants, JP Morgan, passion for control over other human beings, policy of governments, private monopoly, Rockafellers, rothchildss, structures of financial controls, the child welfare conspiracy, the child welfare protection industry, total control over your life and your family, ultimate financial power
These are funny cartoons that include references to actual cases in Riverside County, CA.
Posted by sdj4djustice on January 1, 2017 in CPS's Abuse of Power Traumatizing Children and Families, Videos
Tags: abuse of power, adoptive parents, agency, Antoine, Antoine Coley, Ben "Sport" Donnelly, CA, California Courts, caregiving, Child Protective Services, child support, common questions about CPS, complaints, Conspiracy, courts, criminal, current-events, DCFS, DCYF, defense panel, department, Department of Social Services, dependency, Deporto, destiny, detention, detention hearing, DFCS, DHS, Director, disposition, Donnelly, Donnelly Dear Mr. President, dpss, drug tests, economic development department, educating parents, Elizabeth Gravenberg, Elizabeth Wood, EMT certification, evidence, evidence cps is stealing children, evidence falsely accused, exculpatory evidence, Family, Family court, foster care, Fourth Amendment, general neglect, Georgia, going to court, Government, Government Accountability Office, Government agency, Government corruption, government kidnapping children, Grace Presbyterian Church, Grace Presbyterian Church Temecula, grand jury, guardian ad litem, hair follicle, hair follicle testing, harassment, health and human services, hearing officer, hearsay, HHS, homeland security, Honorable, human trafficking, illegal seizure of children, illegally kidnapped, In Re: Donnelly B, Inc. Kim Jasper, ineffective assistance of counsel, information gateway, investigation, Investigations & Reports, investigations of cps. acfs, investigative reports about cps, Irvine, Its a CHILD WELFARE INDUSTRY, Jahari Weir, Jamilia purnell, Janice Dodds, jennie pettet, Judge Monterosso, judges. Riverside County., judicial, judicial accountability, judicial counsel, Judicial GOVERNMENT COURT CORRUPTION, jury trial, Justice, justice center, juvenile, Juvenile court, juvenile dependency, Juvenile dependency court, JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT California, juvenile dependency process, juvie, Keaton, kidjacked, kidnapping, Kim Berger, Kim Jasper, kim jasper no pharmacist, Kristin R, Kristine Vernier, Liz Gravenberg, Lizette Maciel, Mahoney, maltreatment, maltreatment in foster care, Maria Correa, Marla Mahoney, McPhee, medical, medical kidnapping, medical neglect, mental health systems inc., Michael Rushton, minute order, misconduct, misleading, Mondale Act, Monterosso, Murietta, NCCPR, negative drug test, neglect in foster care, neglecting children, Neil Jasper, no code for labor and delivery, no reasonable efforts, non related family member, non-consent to adoption, November 14 2007, NRFM, objection, Office of the Inspector General, OIG, parental rights, protecting children, Quest Diagnostics, referrals, removal, removal order, restraining orders, Rushton, Senator Joe Donnelly, services, social, Social Security, social services, social welfare, Social Work, Social Workers, Stolen Baby Info, Tamikia Coley, testing, the child's best interests, Thomas D. Donnelly, tim donnelly, Title IV-B, Title IV-E, Title IV-E. Social security, TPR, Valerie Scott, Vinson, visitation
Detention: The removal of your child(ren) from your care by Child Protective Services
One thing is very important for people to know and that is Child Protective Services DOES NOT HAVE ANY POWER until YOU GIVE IT TO THEM. Otherwise, they can go take a hike.
If you think there is some kind of law that says that YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THEM you are wrong. No county that I know of has such a law. Often, they arrive with the police. This is merely to INTIMIDATE YOU but also to protect them against you flipping out. We are often shielded from news stories about parents who go postal on social workers who threaten to take their child away. I think so no one gets any crazy ideas. However, a few have made into the mainstream. I have heard of people shooting CPS workers in the face and recently a mother hunted down the social worker who terminated her rights and killed her in cold blood. Let’s be honest, that is our initial urge in such a devastating event. Violence is counterproductive because when that mother’s child grows up she will most likely still be in prison and until the day she dies. There is no chance of ever having a close relationship with your child if you have to spend the rest of your life in prison.
As soon as CPS shows up at your door, and you ignorantly agree to speak to them, RECORD EVERYTHING! If they tell you that they are there to remove your child, say “NO!”. OBJECT to everything that is undocumented, lacks witness testimony, that is unreasonable, and make sure you get it recorded. If that day has already passed, you can still RECORD every future conversation with anyone and everyone involved in your case, in person and over the phone. If you think it is illegal to record a conversation that YOU are a party to, I have news for you:
Who must give permission to record a telephone or in-person conversation?
Federal law permits recording telephone calls and in-person conversations with the consent of at least one of the parties. See 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d). This is called a “one-party consent” law. Under a one-party consent law, you can record a phone call or conversation so long as you are a party to the conversation. Furthermore, if you are not a party to the conversation, a “one-party consent” law will allow you to record the conversation or phone call so long as your source consents and has full knowledge that the communication will be recorded. Check your state’s law to see if they use the one-party consent law.
Every parent feels that their child will be taken “over their dead body”. Believe me, THAT IS WHAT IT WOULD BE if you decided to stick to that way of thinking. Dead or in jail of course. My husband and I went to jail for taking our son back from THEIR ILLEGAL DETENTION of our son, Donnelly. Of course for some reason, CPS in Riverside County, California, believes that they have a legal right over your child WITHOUT ANY SIGNED COURT ORDERS giving them custody! The police do not require the same from CPS as they do parents when involved in a “legal” custody battle. Us parents need to show the police a duly court stamped CUSTODY ORDER SIGNED BY AN OFFICIAL STATE JUDGE in order to receive their assistance to regain custody and control over your child. CPS can simply say they have custody and sometimes show them a MINUTE ORDER that is NOT SIGNED BY ANY JUDGE (because the “official” they call a “Judge” is merely an ADMINISTRATIVE “HEARING OFFICER”). BE SURE TO RESEARCH THIS IN YOUR COUNTY.
In California, CPS MUST CONSIDER PLACEMENT WITH A FAMILY MEMBER FIRST! This is from the current CA Welfare & Institutions Code:
361.3. (a) In any case in which a child is removed from the physical custody of his or her parents pursuant to Section 361, preferential consideration shall be given to a request by a relative of the child for placement of the child with the relative, regardless of the relative's immigration status. In determining whether placement with a relative is appropriate, the county social worker and court shall consider, but shall not be limited to, consideration of all the following factors: (1) The best interest of the child, including special physical, psychological, educational, medical, or emotional needs. (2) The wishes of the parent, the relative, and child, if appropriate. (3) The provisions of Part 6 (commencing with Section 7950) of Division 12 of the Family Code regarding relative placement. (4) Placement of siblings and half siblings in the same home, unless that placement is found to be contrary to the safety and well-being of any of the siblings, as provided in Section 16002. (5) The good moral character of the relative and any other adult living in the home, including whether any individual residing in the home has a prior history of violent criminal acts or has been responsible for acts of child abuse or neglect. (6) The nature and duration of the relationship between the child and the relative, and the relative's desire to care for, and to provide legal permanency for, the child if reunification is unsuccessful. (7) The ability of the relative to do the following: (A) Provide a safe, secure, and stable environment for the child. (B) Exercise proper and effective care and control of the child. (C) Provide a home and the necessities of life for the child. (D) Protect the child from his or her parents. (E) Facilitate court-ordered reunification efforts with the parents. (F) Facilitate visitation with the child's other relatives. (G) Facilitate implementation of all elements of the case plan. (H) Provide legal permanence for the child if reunification fails. However, any finding made with respect to the factor considered pursuant to this subparagraph and pursuant to subparagraph (G) shall not be the sole basis for precluding preferential placement with a relative. (I) Arrange for appropriate and safe child care, as necessary. (8) The safety of the relative's home. For a relative to be considered appropriate to receive placement of a child under this section, the relative's home shall first be approved pursuant to the process and standards described in subdivision (d) of Section 309. In this regard, the Legislature declares that a physical disability, such as blindness or deafness, is no bar to the raising of children, and a county social worker's determination as to the ability of a disabled relative to exercise care and control should center upon whether the relative's disability prevents him or her from exercising care and control. The court shall order the parent to disclose to the county social worker the names, residences, and any other known identifying information of any maternal or paternal relatives of the child. This inquiry shall not be construed, however, to guarantee that the child will be placed with any person so identified. The county social worker shall initially contact the relatives given preferential consideration for placement to determine if they desire the child to be placed with them. Those desiring placement shall be assessed according to the factors enumerated in this subdivision. The county social worker shall document these efforts in the social study prepared pursuant to Section 358.1. The court shall authorize the county social worker, while assessing these relatives for the possibility of placement, to disclose to the relative, as appropriate, the fact that the child is in custody, the alleged reasons for the custody, and the projected likely date for the child's return home or placement for adoption or legal guardianship. However, this investigation shall not be construed as good cause for continuance of the dispositional hearing conducted pursuant to Section 358. (b) In any case in which more than one appropriate relative requests preferential consideration pursuant to this section, each relative shall be considered under the factors enumerated in subdivision (a). Consistent with the legislative intent for children to be placed immediately with a responsible relative, this section does not limit the county social worker's ability to place a child in the home of an appropriate relative or a nonrelative extended family member pending the consideration of other relatives who have requested preferential consideration. (c) For purposes of this section: (1) "Preferential consideration" means that the relative seeking placement shall be the first placement to be considered and investigated. (2) "Relative" means an adult who is related to the child by blood, adoption, or affinity within the fifth degree of kinship, including stepparents, stepsiblings, and all relatives whose status is preceded by the words "great," "great-great," or "grand," or the spouse of any of these persons even if the marriage was terminated by death or dissolution. However, only the following relatives shall be given preferential consideration for the placement of the child: an adult who is a grandparent, aunt, uncle, or sibling. (d) Subsequent to the hearing conducted pursuant to Section 358, whenever a new placement of the child must be made, consideration for placement shall again be given as described in this section to relatives who have not been found to be unsuitable and who will fulfill the child's reunification or permanent plan requirements. In addition to the factors described in subdivision (a), the county social worker shall consider whether the relative has established and maintained a relationship with the child. (e) If the court does not place the child with a relative who has been considered for placement pursuant to this section, the court shall state for the record the reasons placement with that relative was denied. (f) (1) With respect to a child who satisfies the criteria set forth in paragraph (2), the department and any licensed adoption agency may search for a relative and furnish identifying information relating to the child to that relative if it is believed the child's welfare will be promoted thereby. (2) Paragraph (1) shall apply if both of the following conditions are satisfied: (A) The child was previously a dependent of the court. (B) The child was previously adopted and the adoption has been disrupted, set aside pursuant to Section 9100 or 9102 of the Family Code, or the child has been released into the custody of the department or a licensed adoption agency by the adoptive parent or parents. (3) As used in this subdivision, "relative" includes a member of the child's birth family and nonrelated extended family members, regardless of whether the parental rights were terminated, provided that both of the following are true: (A) No appropriate potential caretaker is known to exist from the child's adoptive family, including nonrelated extended family members of the adoptive family. (B) The child was not the subject of a voluntary relinquishment by the birth parents pursuant to Section 8700 of the Family Code or Section 1255.7 of the Health and Safety Code.
All too often, CPS will use a catch phrase to support their kidnapping of your child(ren) such as “the child was at imminent risk” or even the lesser, “the child was at risk”. The “risk” can be as minimal as to not even exist because they can make it up and not have to provide ANY real evidence or ANY real witnesses. In most Juvenile Dependency actions, (which is ACTUALLY JUST A CIVIL OR ADMINISTRATIVE COURT) the mere filing of a Petition along with a Detention Report, regardless of its correctness or truthfulness, constitutes a “prima facie” case which means:
[Latin, On the first appearance.] A fact presumed to be true unless it is disproved.
In common parlance the term prima facie is used to describe the apparent nature of something upon initial observation. In legal practice the term generally is used to describe two things: the presentation of sufficient evidence by a civil claimant to support the legal claim (a prima facie case), or a piece of evidence itself (prima facie evidence).
For most civil claims, a plaintiff must present a prima facie case to avoid dismissal ofthe case or an unfavorable directed verdict. The plaintiff must produce enough evidence on all elements of the claim to support the claim and shift the burden of evidence production to the respondent. If the plaintiff fails to make a prima facie case,the respondent may move for dismissal or a favorable directed verdict without presenting any evidence to rebut whatever evidence the plaintiff has presented. This is because the burden of persuading a judge or jury always rests with the plaintiff.
Assume that a plaintiff claims that an employer failed to promote her based on hersex. The plaintiff must produce affirmative evidence showing that the employer used illegitimate, discriminatory criteria in making employment decisions that concerned the plaintiff. The employer, as respondent, does not have a burden to produce evidence until the plaintiff has made a prima facie case of Sex Discrimination (TexasDepartment of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 101 S. Ct. 1089, 67 L. Ed.2d 207 ). The precise amount of evidence that constitutes a prima facie case varies from claim to claim. If the plaintiff does not present a prima facie case with sufficient evidence, the judge may dismiss the case. Or, if the case is being heard by a jury, the judge may direct the jury to return a verdict for the respondent.
Prima facie also refers to specific evidence that, if believed, supports a case or anelement that needs to be proved in the case. The term prima facie evidence is used inboth civil and Criminal Law. For example, if the prosecution in a murder casepresents a videotape showing the defendant screaming death threats at the victim,such evidence may be prima facie evidence of intent to kill, an element that must beproved by the prosecution before the defendant may be convicted of murder. On itsface, the evidence indicates that the defendant intended to kill the victim.
Statutes may specify that certain evidence is prima facie evidence of a certain fact.For example, a duly authenticated copy of a defendant’s criminal record may beconsidered prima facie evidence of the defendant’s prior convictions and may be usedagainst the defendant in court (Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 18-3-412 [West 1996]). A Civil Law example is a statute that makes a duly certified copy or duplicate of a certificateof authority for a fraternal benefit society to transact business prima facie evidencethat the society is legal and legitimate (Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 10-14-603 [West1996]).
Herlitz, Georg Nils. 1994. “The Meaning of the Term ‘Prima Facie.'” Louisiana LawReview 55.
(pry-mah fay-shah) adj. Latin for “at first look,” or “on its face,” referring to a lawsuit or criminal prosecution in which the evidence before trial is sufficient to prove the case unless there is substantial contradictory evidence presented at trial. A prima facie case presented to a grand jury by the prosecution will result in an indictment. Example: in a charge of bad check writing, evidence of a half dozen checks written on a non-existent bank account, makes it a prima facie case. However, proof that the bank had misprinted the account number on the checks might disprove the prosecution’s apparent “open and shut” case. (See: prima facie case)
Most often, CPS has NO WARRANT AND THEREFORE NO LEGAL GROUNDS TO REMOVE YOUR CHILD! They must state in their PETITION as well as their DETENTION REPORT what the reasons are, and if no warrant, they must state the facts, clearly and concisely, what evidence they had to believe the child(ren) were at imminent risk of being abuse or neglected. Do you know what they say in their detention reports? Things like, “The family has had a prior CPS case therefore, due to someone calling in again then the parents did not benefit from services provided by the Department therefore the child was at risk of abuse or neglect.”! WTF???
Sometimes it is very difficult for me to write these posts as this kind of shit really disturbs me!
I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THAT YOU DO THE FOLLOWING AT THIS POINT:
- RESEARCH RESEARCH RESEARCH – Look up your state’s laws regarding child welfare, look up and get a copy of your county’s MANUAL OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, find out what YOUR ATTORNEY CAN AND SHOULD DO FOR YOU AND WHAT YOUR CHILD’S ATTORNEY CAN AND SHOULD BE DOING FOR YOUR CHILD(REN). Call them on their lack of proper representation, call them, leave messages, quote the laws and policies you look up, write and call their superiors if the attorney is not making proper responses and objections. You can also find help on Facebook page called Families Against Government Abuse: https://www.facebook.com/groups/familesagainstgovernmentabuse/?ref=browser and another called T.E.A.R.S.: https://www.facebook.com/groups/347127752109413/?ref=browser From there you should find many more groups.
Tags: 14th amendment parents rights to child, 4 Amendment rights of children to sue CPS, abuse in foster care, abused children, abused children sue CPS, abusive social workers, addoption help, Administration for Children and Families, adopt children from foster care, adopted children abused, Alex Jones Riverside County, american children being stolen, Antoine Coley, ASFA, babies being stolen from hospitals by CPS, Burns., CAPTA, CASA, CDT, CDT Kim Jasper, Child, child endangerment, Child Protective Service, child trafficing, civil action against Riverside County, Comprehensive, Conspiracy, cps, CPS corruption OUT OF CONTROL, CPS Hotline, crimes, criminal charges against child protective service worker, Daniel Vinson, dependency court, detention, do not let cps talk to your children alone, Donnelly, Donnelly Burns, Donnelly Keaton Burns, Dr. Kim Jasper, evidence, false statements, falsified evidence, familial association, Family, family placement, foster care, help my mother reported me to cps, judges, judges. Riverside County., juvenile dependency, Juvenile dependency court, juvie, kidnapping, Kim Berger, Kim Jasper, lawyer, legal, mandated reporter, Marla Mahoney, perjury by social worker, Petition to remove your child, prima facie, referrals, removal, Riverside County, Rushton, Senator Nancy Schaefer, Sharon Burns, Social Workers, Southwest Juvenile Dependency scam, Stolen Baby Info, sue cps, Susan Loew, Susan McPhee, tim donnelly, Title IV-E, United States, William Burns
THIS SITE IS DEDICATED AND NAMED AFTER MY PRECIOUS SON, DONNELLY KEATON BURNS.
I AM CRYING RIGHT NOW.
Tags: addoption help, Alex Tran, Alexandra Logan Burns Tran, Amanda Scott, amanda spratley, Antoine Coley, ASFA, Beth Donth, Burns., CAPTA, Child, Child protection, Child Protective Services, child trafficing, Conspiracy, corruption, cps, CPS corruption OUT OF CONTROL, crimes, Denzel Washington, Donnelly, Donnelly Keaton Burns, Elizabeth Donth, Elizabeth Gravenberg, Elizabeth Wood, Family, family ties, jennie pettet, judges, judges. Riverside County., juvenile dependency, legal, Leslie Ann Burns, Leslie Ann Logan, leslie hoyle, Marla Mahoney, MFA, MHI, MHS, MSI, Pam Acra, Patti Owens, Rushton, Senator Nancy Schaefer, Sharon Burns, Sherron Logan, Social Workers, Southwest Juvenile Dependency scam, Stolen Baby Info, Susan Loew, Susan McPhee, Title IV-E, United States, William Burns
Referral has two meanings in Child Protective Services
Referral=When someone calls a CPS hotline and says that they believe a child is being abused.
Referral= An approval and authorization to provide payment to a “service” that is “required” and demanded upon you in order to get your child(ren) back from CPS such as counseling, drug testing and parenting classes.
For this post I will be “referring” to the first REFERRAL I described above.
Who called CPS on you? Was it a family member or close friend?
This is the shittiest type of referral because these are the people who are supposed to be there for you, not feed you to the wolves. If a family member or close friend feels that they are “helping” you by calling CPS on you then they do not deserve to be considered family or close friend. With friends and family like that, you don’t need any enemies. If you are one of those family or friends that have called on someone, I think that if you are here, you are regretting it. It’s OK, at least you are here and most people have no clue as to what they are doing to a family when they make that call. But did you have the BEST intentions? NO you didn’t but still, you are here. The best thing you can do for them now is TAKE BACK WHAT YOU SAID AND DO IT IN COURT AND ON PAPER, SUBMIT IT TO THE JUDGE PERSONALLY. HELP YOUR FAMILY MEMBER OR CLOSE FRIEND AS MUCH AS YOU CAN AND NEVER DO THAT AGAIN!
ANYONE CAN CALL THE CPS HOTLINE and report anything they want regardless of whether they are telling the truth or NOT. A disgruntled neighbor, friend, family member, an ex-spouse or partner, your child’s friend’s mother or father, a complete stranger who witnessed you yelling at your kid in the grocery store and managed to get the phone number you have on your car advertising your business, a jogger passing by your house and hears a loud bang and then the cry of a child (this really happened to a friend of my brother’s. The loud bang was a broomstick falling to the floor and it startled a young child causing them to cry. The broom wasn’t even close to hitting the child.) The person making the “referral” does not have to have proof nor do they ever have to testify! NEVER! Their names are kept secret (unless they call your social worker directly while you have an open case, then this information may be in the case/contact log). No background check for the person’s credibility will be performed and they can be convicted child abusers themselves!
What can you do to avoid the “referral” by someone you know? You certainly can lower the odds by just getting along with people. I wish I would have put more effort into not being a bitch to my husband’s ex-wife that is for sure! I thought I was so much better than her, I looked at her like she was a piece of shit (she was and still is) but I didn’t have to go out of my way to write her that letter telling her so. I had my reasons at the time but golly gee willicker, if I could go back in time, I would kiss that woman’s ass for sure! I had no idea of the evil she was capable of doing. So be kind to your neighbors, ex-spouse or girlfriend, be tolerant of certain personality defects, try your best to be firm but always nice. Don’t piss your mother off (they must rank #4 in the people who call!) and try to get along with your sister. This would not only improve your chances of not being falsely reported, it also strengthens your family bonds and that is positive for everyone.
MANDATED REPORTERS AND OTHER PROFESSIONALS
A lot of calls are from “mandated reporters” who are professionals who can be charged with a crime for failing to report “suspected” child abuse either in criminal or civil court as well as pay a hefty fine and possibly lose their license. I believe that there may be a minimum referral quota but I can not verify that.
Here is a partial list of “Mandated Reporters”:
School Cafeteria Lady/Worker
School Clerk/Office Staff
School Social Worker
Hospital Social Worker
Doctor’s Office Staff
Dental Office Staff
Code Enforcement Officers
Animal Control Officers
Substance Abuse Program Directors, Counselors, Volunteers and Office Staff
Domestic Violence Prevention Program Directors, Counselors, Volunteers and Office Staff
Parenting Class Teacher, Administrator, Volunteers and Office Staff
Anyone who works at Macy’s Department Store (no kidding!)
Utility Workers (like the people that come out to turn on/off your electricity, water or gas)
Refuse Pick-up Drivers
Mail Delivery Persons
ANY PERSON WHO WORKS FOR GOVERNMENT INCLUDING CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND FEDERAL!
Each CPS office has its own referral evaluation process. You should be able to find the one for your county by searching, “Child Welfare Policies in ____ County”. How the agency in your area responds depends on several factors such as current case load, budget conditions and case to staff ratio. All too often calls will be “evaluated out” simply because they were understaffed and over budget already. Even more disgusting is when CPS KNOWS a child is in real danger and they don’t do a damn thing! They let that child get hurt or die just so they can spin it so that they can say they need more money! Shameful, despicable behavior!
The call center will receive the call, ask pertinent information about the child and the child’s family and/or residence but they will not verify the caller’s credibility whatsoever. Personally, the person who called on us was herself a child abuser and on the CACI index along with having a criminal record which included child endangerment. Not to mention a lengthy drug abuse history!
At your first hearing be sure to OBJECT to any policy violations that you can find. If they are supposed to get a warrant then OBJECT to the detention of your children on the grounds that they violated ____ Policy (state your source which is the Manual for your county). Do this especially if they did not have any valid reason to suspect that your child was at imminent risk. Such as simply school attendance ONE alleged positive drug test or for refusing to drug test. You can use this policy in your Objections, Declaration and Statements of Fact in Response to the Petition and Detention Reports. Be sure to list all the policies and procedures that they did not adhere to regarding the referral, investigation and removal of your child(ren).
CPS abuses their power this is no secret. Supposedly, they get a rush from “saving” children so most often, to feed their egos and get their “saving” fix for the day, they will out and out falsify things you say and things your children say so NEVER speak to them without an attorney present. I know this is hard to do so at least say as little as you can! Always be polite because they will use your attitude against you. Say everything with a smile and thank them for their concern. But still, do your homework, READ YOUR COUNTY’S CHILD WELFARE POLICIES AND USE IT AGAINST THEM AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY. IT WILL GO A LONG WAY TO MAKING YOUR CASE FOR THE APPEALS COURT.
Tags: addoption help, Antoine Coley, ASFA, Burns., CAPTA, CDT, Child, child endangerment, Child protection, Child Protective Services, child trafficing, Comprehensive, Conspiracy, corruption, CPS and Government corruption, CPS corruption OUT OF CONTROL, CPS has no ACCOUNTABILITY or OVERSIGHT, crimes, Donnelly, Donnelly Burns, Dr. Kim Jasper, foster care, jennie pettet, judges, judges. Riverside County., Juvenile court, juvenile dependency, kidnapping, Kim Berger, Kim Jasper, Marla Mahoney, Riverside County, Rushton, Senator Nancy Schaefer, Sharon Burns, Social Workers, Southwest Juvenile Dependency scam, Stolen Baby Info, Susan McPhee, Title IV-E, United States, William Burns
I finally completed Part 6 of our story including getting arrested for a possession of stolen property that was not stolen and more falsified hair follicle tests.
Part 7 should be much more exciting as I will explain what happened in Arizona and show how we “stole” our son back from CPS who never has legal custody of our children because they never had any SIGNED COURT ORDERS!
Posted by sdj4djustice on September 6, 2015 in CPS's Abuse of Power Traumatizing Children and Families, Stolen Baby Info, Videos
Tags: abuse of power, addoption help, amanda spratley, American Safe Families Act, Antoine, Antoine Coley, ASFA, Burns., CA, California, CAPTA, CDT, Child, Child abuse, child endangerment, Child protection, Child Protective Service, Child Protective Services, child trafficing, Child Welfare, children, coercion, Conspiracy, corruption, court, Court Cohorts Collaborating and Collecting Kids, cps, CPS and Government corruption, CPS and Government crimes, CPS corruption OUT OF CONTROL, CPS has no ACCOUNTABILITY or OVERSIGHT, crimes, Dan Vinson, Daniel Vinson, dependency, Donnelly, Donnelly Burns, Donnelly Keaton Burns, dpss, evidence, false allegations, falsified documents, falsified evidence, Family, foster care, fostering connections, funding, Government, I need to apologize to some members of my brother's family for using their names as tags on my blog posts I am truly sorry, Investigations & Reports, Its a CHILD WELFARE INDUSTRY, jennie pettet, Jon R, judges, judges. Riverside County., JUDICIARY MALFEASANCE, jurisdiction, Justice, juvenile, Juvenile court, juvenile dependency, Juvenile dependency court, JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT California, kidjacked, kidnapping, Kim Berger, Kim Jasper, Kristin R, Kristine Vernier, law, Lawless America, legal, legally kidnapped, Leslie Ann Hoyle, Leslie Logan, Leslie Raven Mystique, Leslie Rebella, Marla Mahoney, Monterosso, OIG, oski, OUR STORY, parental rights, perjury, Perjury and Falsification of Documents, police, Ratk, Raven Mystique, Research! Law, Riverside County, Rushton, Senator Nancy Schaefer, Sharon Burns, Social Security, social services, Social Work, Social Workers, Southwest Justice Center, Southwest Juvenile Dependency scam, Stolen Baby Info, Susan Loew, Susan McPhee, Temecula, Title IV-E, United States, Videos, Wake up America, We ARE Dedicated to Helping Families Stay Together, welfare, William Burns
Posted by sdj4djustice on August 17, 2015 in CPS's Abuse of Power Traumatizing Children and Families
Tags: abusive social workers, accountability, addoption help, adopt a child, adopt a child from social services, adopt a highway, adoption problems, Adult Protective Services stealing parent's retirement and social security, aging out of the system, American Safe Families Act social security, Antoine Coley, ASFA, Board of Supervisors, Burns., CA social services, CAPTA, CDT, Child, child endangerment, Child protection, Child Protective Service, child trafficing, children bought and sold by the state, christians who hate biological parents for no reason, community hospital, Comprehensive Drug Testing, Conspiracy, corrupt court, corruption, cps, CPS and Government corruption, CPS and Government crimes, CPS corruption OUT OF CONTROL, crimes, Donnelly, Donnelly Burns, Dr. Kim Jasper, Family, fight CPS, fighting CPS, foster youth, fostering families, fostering youth, how can i fight cps, jennie pettet, judges, judges. Riverside County., Juvenile court, juvenile dependency, kidnapping, Kim Berger, Kim Jasper, lawyers who sue cps, legal, local youth groups, Marla Mahoney, Rushton, Senator Nancy Schaefer, Sharon Burns, Social Workers, Southwest Juvenile Dependency scam, Stolen Baby Info, suing cps, Susan Loew, Susan McPhee, thank you cps, Title IV-E, United States, what does social services do, William Burns, youth groups