This is a precedent. Hope to see more!
Posted by sdj4djustice on April 22, 2016 in CPS's Abuse of Power Traumatizing Children and Families, Falsified Evidence, How Social Services CARES About Kids!
Tags: abuse in foster care, abuse in out-of-home care, abuse of power, abused to death, accountability, addoption help, Administration for Children and Families, Administrative Office of the Courts, adopt a child from social services, adoption incentives, advocacy, amanda spratley, anonymous caller, Antoine Coley, appealable issues, Appellate court, Arizona, ASFA, audit, BabyLK, background check, Bank of America, banking, Banning Jail, barack obama, become a foster parent, benefits, Beth Donth, bias, bill of rights, blog, Board of Supervisors, brainwashing of children, breaking news, Burns and Oblichinski, Burns., buy-in, CA, California, California Courts, California Department of Social Services, california welfare & institutions code, CAPTA, CDT, Child, child endangerment, Child Protective Service, Child Protective Services, Child Stealing, child trafficing, Child Welfare, child welfare industry, children, children tortured, Children Youth and Family, children's rights, coercion, collaborative partners, complaints, Constitutional Rights, court, Court Cohorts Collaborating and Collecting Kids, court cohorts collecting kids, CPS and Government corruption, CPS and Government crimes, CPS corruption OUT OF CONTROL, CPS has no ACCOUNTABILITY or OVERSIGHT, CPS Whistleblowers, crime, criminal justice, defense panel Burns and Oblanchiinski, dependency process, detention hearing, DHS, Director, Dispositional Hearing, divorce, Donnelly Keaton, Dorothy Mokote, drug tests, drugs, dyfs, EBT, educate yourself, educating parents, efforts, election, Elizabeth Wood, etc., Eve, evidence falsely accused, evil people, Expert Witnesses, fabricated evidence, fake, falsely charged, falsely prosecuted, falsified hair follicle tests, families, Family, Family court, Family Preservation Court, FDIC, fight CPS, First 5, forgery, foster agency, foster care, foster parents, Fourth Amendment, fraud, freedom, funding fraud, general neglect, going to court, hair follicle, harassment, help fighting cps, help fighting false allegations of child abuse, help they took my babies, Honorable, hope, hopeless, hospital, house, How CPS Is Out To Get Your Child and How They Ruin Families, how to defend yourself in court, how to present and argument, how to win your cps case, how to write a letter to social services, illegally kidnapped, In Re: Donnelly B, INCENTIVES & BONUSES, information gateway, investigation, Investigations & Reports, jennie pettet, judges, judges. Riverside County., kidnapping, Kim Berger, LA DCFS, learn, legal advice, Legal Advice (No Law Degree Needed), legal kidnapping, legally kidnapped, Leslie Burns, Leslie Logan, letters, Letters to Donnellyjustice, Lizette Maciel, Lori Fineman, lying on the stand, lying to the judge, Social Work, Social Workers, social workers guilty of falsifying records, social workers leave abused children in the home, social workers prosecuted, Stolen Baby Info, sunshine sykes, THE FBI - Making a report, Title IV-E, Wake up America
Read the newsletter I have linked above. Note the first page where it states that LA County files over 100,000 Petitions each YEAR! Then, move on to the third page where it describes what the court provides for the children while they are at court. Sounds like a CIRCUS to me! Popcorn, games, representatives from the Wild Animal Zoo bringing animals to the court for the children’s “entertainment” because they usually leave court “in tears”. Well, if they were removing children from really abusive homes, they probably wouldn’t necessarily be in tears! They are in tears because THEY HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM A DECENT HOME AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATED FROM THEIR PARENTS AND SIBLINGS AND THE COUNTY JUST DENIED THEM TO BE ABLE TO GO HOME!
This crap really pisses me off, they are fake scoundrels who earn a living off the stealing of our children!
Posted by sdj4djustice on December 15, 2015 in COURT IS A CIRCUS, CPS's Abuse of Power Traumatizing Children and Families
Tags: addoption help, California Courts, California Department of Social Services, California Rules, California salaries, california welfare & institutions code, CDT, CDT Kim Jasper, Child Protective Services, Comprehensive, DCFS, dpss, Dr. Kim Berger, Dr. Kim Jasper, Kim Berger, Kim Jasper, LA county, Los Angeles, Southwest Juvenile Dependency scam, Susan Loew
Who must give permission to record a telephone or in-person conversation?
Federal law permits recording telephone calls and in-person conversations with the consent of at least one of the parties. See 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d). This is called a “one-party consent” law. Under a one-party consent law, you can record a phone call or conversation so long as you are a party to the conversation. Furthermore, if you are not a party to the conversation, a “one-party consent” law will allow you to record the conversation or phone call so long as your source consents and has full knowledge that the communication will be recorded. Check your state’s law to see if they use the one-party consent law.
361.3. (a) In any case in which a child is removed from the physical custody of his or her parents pursuant to Section 361, preferential consideration shall be given to a request by a relative of the child for placement of the child with the relative, regardless of the relative's immigration status. In determining whether placement with a relative is appropriate, the county social worker and court shall consider, but shall not be limited to, consideration of all the following factors: (1) The best interest of the child, including special physical, psychological, educational, medical, or emotional needs. (2) The wishes of the parent, the relative, and child, if appropriate. (3) The provisions of Part 6 (commencing with Section 7950) of Division 12 of the Family Code regarding relative placement. (4) Placement of siblings and half siblings in the same home, unless that placement is found to be contrary to the safety and well-being of any of the siblings, as provided in Section 16002. (5) The good moral character of the relative and any other adult living in the home, including whether any individual residing in the home has a prior history of violent criminal acts or has been responsible for acts of child abuse or neglect. (6) The nature and duration of the relationship between the child and the relative, and the relative's desire to care for, and to provide legal permanency for, the child if reunification is unsuccessful. (7) The ability of the relative to do the following: (A) Provide a safe, secure, and stable environment for the child. (B) Exercise proper and effective care and control of the child. (C) Provide a home and the necessities of life for the child. (D) Protect the child from his or her parents. (E) Facilitate court-ordered reunification efforts with the parents. (F) Facilitate visitation with the child's other relatives. (G) Facilitate implementation of all elements of the case plan. (H) Provide legal permanence for the child if reunification fails. However, any finding made with respect to the factor considered pursuant to this subparagraph and pursuant to subparagraph (G) shall not be the sole basis for precluding preferential placement with a relative. (I) Arrange for appropriate and safe child care, as necessary. (8) The safety of the relative's home. For a relative to be considered appropriate to receive placement of a child under this section, the relative's home shall first be approved pursuant to the process and standards described in subdivision (d) of Section 309. In this regard, the Legislature declares that a physical disability, such as blindness or deafness, is no bar to the raising of children, and a county social worker's determination as to the ability of a disabled relative to exercise care and control should center upon whether the relative's disability prevents him or her from exercising care and control. The court shall order the parent to disclose to the county social worker the names, residences, and any other known identifying information of any maternal or paternal relatives of the child. This inquiry shall not be construed, however, to guarantee that the child will be placed with any person so identified. The county social worker shall initially contact the relatives given preferential consideration for placement to determine if they desire the child to be placed with them. Those desiring placement shall be assessed according to the factors enumerated in this subdivision. The county social worker shall document these efforts in the social study prepared pursuant to Section 358.1. The court shall authorize the county social worker, while assessing these relatives for the possibility of placement, to disclose to the relative, as appropriate, the fact that the child is in custody, the alleged reasons for the custody, and the projected likely date for the child's return home or placement for adoption or legal guardianship. However, this investigation shall not be construed as good cause for continuance of the dispositional hearing conducted pursuant to Section 358. (b) In any case in which more than one appropriate relative requests preferential consideration pursuant to this section, each relative shall be considered under the factors enumerated in subdivision (a). Consistent with the legislative intent for children to be placed immediately with a responsible relative, this section does not limit the county social worker's ability to place a child in the home of an appropriate relative or a nonrelative extended family member pending the consideration of other relatives who have requested preferential consideration. (c) For purposes of this section: (1) "Preferential consideration" means that the relative seeking placement shall be the first placement to be considered and investigated. (2) "Relative" means an adult who is related to the child by blood, adoption, or affinity within the fifth degree of kinship, including stepparents, stepsiblings, and all relatives whose status is preceded by the words "great," "great-great," or "grand," or the spouse of any of these persons even if the marriage was terminated by death or dissolution. However, only the following relatives shall be given preferential consideration for the placement of the child: an adult who is a grandparent, aunt, uncle, or sibling. (d) Subsequent to the hearing conducted pursuant to Section 358, whenever a new placement of the child must be made, consideration for placement shall again be given as described in this section to relatives who have not been found to be unsuitable and who will fulfill the child's reunification or permanent plan requirements. In addition to the factors described in subdivision (a), the county social worker shall consider whether the relative has established and maintained a relationship with the child. (e) If the court does not place the child with a relative who has been considered for placement pursuant to this section, the court shall state for the record the reasons placement with that relative was denied. (f) (1) With respect to a child who satisfies the criteria set forth in paragraph (2), the department and any licensed adoption agency may search for a relative and furnish identifying information relating to the child to that relative if it is believed the child's welfare will be promoted thereby. (2) Paragraph (1) shall apply if both of the following conditions are satisfied: (A) The child was previously a dependent of the court. (B) The child was previously adopted and the adoption has been disrupted, set aside pursuant to Section 9100 or 9102 of the Family Code, or the child has been released into the custody of the department or a licensed adoption agency by the adoptive parent or parents. (3) As used in this subdivision, "relative" includes a member of the child's birth family and nonrelated extended family members, regardless of whether the parental rights were terminated, provided that both of the following are true: (A) No appropriate potential caretaker is known to exist from the child's adoptive family, including nonrelated extended family members of the adoptive family. (B) The child was not the subject of a voluntary relinquishment by the birth parents pursuant to Section 8700 of the Family Code or Section 1255.7 of the Health and Safety Code.
[Latin, On the first appearance.] A fact presumed to be true unless it is disproved.
In common parlance the term prima facie is used to describe the apparent nature of something upon initial observation. In legal practice the term generally is used to describe two things: the presentation of sufficient evidence by a civil claimant to support the legal claim (a prima facie case), or a piece of evidence itself (prima facie evidence).
For most civil claims, a plaintiff must present a prima facie case to avoid dismissal ofthe case or an unfavorable directed verdict. The plaintiff must produce enough evidence on all elements of the claim to support the claim and shift the burden of evidence production to the respondent. If the plaintiff fails to make a prima facie case,the respondent may move for dismissal or a favorable directed verdict without presenting any evidence to rebut whatever evidence the plaintiff has presented. This is because the burden of persuading a judge or jury always rests with the plaintiff.
Assume that a plaintiff claims that an employer failed to promote her based on hersex. The plaintiff must produce affirmative evidence showing that the employer used illegitimate, discriminatory criteria in making employment decisions that concerned the plaintiff. The employer, as respondent, does not have a burden to produce evidence until the plaintiff has made a prima facie case of Sex Discrimination (TexasDepartment of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 101 S. Ct. 1089, 67 L. Ed.2d 207 ). The precise amount of evidence that constitutes a prima facie case varies from claim to claim. If the plaintiff does not present a prima facie case with sufficient evidence, the judge may dismiss the case. Or, if the case is being heard by a jury, the judge may direct the jury to return a verdict for the respondent.
Prima facie also refers to specific evidence that, if believed, supports a case or anelement that needs to be proved in the case. The term prima facie evidence is used inboth civil and Criminal Law. For example, if the prosecution in a murder casepresents a videotape showing the defendant screaming death threats at the victim,such evidence may be prima facie evidence of intent to kill, an element that must beproved by the prosecution before the defendant may be convicted of murder. On itsface, the evidence indicates that the defendant intended to kill the victim.
Statutes may specify that certain evidence is prima facie evidence of a certain fact.For example, a duly authenticated copy of a defendant’s criminal record may beconsidered prima facie evidence of the defendant’s prior convictions and may be usedagainst the defendant in court (Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 18-3-412 [West 1996]). A Civil Law example is a statute that makes a duly certified copy or duplicate of a certificateof authority for a fraternal benefit society to transact business prima facie evidencethat the society is legal and legitimate (Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 10-14-603 [West1996]).
Herlitz, Georg Nils. 1994. “The Meaning of the Term ‘Prima Facie.'” Louisiana LawReview 55.
(pry-mah fay-shah) adj. Latin for “at first look,” or “on its face,” referring to a lawsuit or criminal prosecution in which the evidence before trial is sufficient to prove the case unless there is substantial contradictory evidence presented at trial. A prima facie case presented to a grand jury by the prosecution will result in an indictment. Example: in a charge of bad check writing, evidence of a half dozen checks written on a non-existent bank account, makes it a prima facie case. However, proof that the bank had misprinted the account number on the checks might disprove the prosecution’s apparent “open and shut” case. (See: prima facie case)
I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THAT YOU DO THE FOLLOWING AT THIS POINT:
Tags: 14th amendment parents rights to child, 4 Amendment rights of children to sue CPS, abuse in foster care, abused children, abused children sue CPS, abusive social workers, addoption help, Administration for Children and Families, adopt children from foster care, adopted children abused, Alex Jones Riverside County, american children being stolen, Antoine Coley, ASFA, babies being stolen from hospitals by CPS, Burns., CAPTA, CASA, CDT, CDT Kim Jasper, Child, child endangerment, Child Protective Service, child trafficing, civil action against Riverside County, Comprehensive, Conspiracy, cps, CPS corruption OUT OF CONTROL, CPS Hotline, crimes, criminal charges against child protective service worker, Daniel Vinson, dependency court, detention, do not let cps talk to your children alone, Donnelly, Donnelly Burns, Donnelly Keaton Burns, Dr. Kim Jasper, evidence, false statements, falsified evidence, familial association, Family, family placement, foster care, help my mother reported me to cps, judges, judges. Riverside County., juvenile dependency, Juvenile dependency court, juvie, kidnapping, Kim Berger, Kim Jasper, lawyer, legal, mandated reporter, Marla Mahoney, perjury by social worker, Petition to remove your child, prima facie, referrals, removal, Riverside County, Rushton, Senator Nancy Schaefer, Sharon Burns, Social Workers, Southwest Juvenile Dependency scam, Stolen Baby Info, sue cps, Susan Loew, Susan McPhee, tim donnelly, Title IV-E, United States, William Burns
THIS SITE IS DEDICATED AND NAMED AFTER MY PRECIOUS SON, DONNELLY KEATON BURNS.
I AM CRYING RIGHT NOW.
Tags: addoption help, Alex Tran, Alexandra Logan Burns Tran, Amanda Scott, amanda spratley, Antoine Coley, ASFA, Beth Donth, Burns., CAPTA, Child, Child protection, Child Protective Services, child trafficing, Conspiracy, corruption, cps, CPS corruption OUT OF CONTROL, crimes, Denzel Washington, Donnelly, Donnelly Keaton Burns, Elizabeth Donth, Elizabeth Gravenberg, Elizabeth Wood, Family, family ties, jennie pettet, judges, judges. Riverside County., juvenile dependency, legal, Leslie Ann Burns, Leslie Ann Logan, leslie hoyle, Marla Mahoney, MFA, MHI, MHS, MSI, Pam Acra, Patti Owens, Rushton, Senator Nancy Schaefer, Sharon Burns, Sherron Logan, Social Workers, Southwest Juvenile Dependency scam, Stolen Baby Info, Susan Loew, Susan McPhee, Title IV-E, United States, William Burns
Referral= An approval and authorization to provide payment to a “service” that is “required” and demanded upon you in order to get your child(ren) back from CPS such as counseling, drug testing and parenting classes.
For this post I will be “referring” to the first REFERRAL I described above.
School Cafeteria Lady/Worker
School Clerk/Office Staff
School Social Worker
Hospital Social Worker
Doctor’s Office Staff
Dental Office Staff
Code Enforcement Officers
Animal Control Officers
Substance Abuse Program Directors, Counselors, Volunteers and Office Staff
Domestic Violence Prevention Program Directors, Counselors, Volunteers and Office Staff
Parenting Class Teacher, Administrator, Volunteers and Office Staff
Anyone who works at Macy’s Department Store (no kidding!)
Utility Workers (like the people that come out to turn on/off your electricity, water or gas)
Refuse Pick-up Drivers
Mail Delivery Persons
ANY PERSON WHO WORKS FOR GOVERNMENT INCLUDING CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND FEDERAL!
Tags: addoption help, Antoine Coley, ASFA, Burns., CAPTA, CDT, Child, child endangerment, Child protection, Child Protective Services, child trafficing, Comprehensive, Conspiracy, corruption, CPS and Government corruption, CPS corruption OUT OF CONTROL, CPS has no ACCOUNTABILITY or OVERSIGHT, crimes, Donnelly, Donnelly Burns, Dr. Kim Jasper, foster care, jennie pettet, judges, judges. Riverside County., Juvenile court, juvenile dependency, kidnapping, Kim Berger, Kim Jasper, Marla Mahoney, Riverside County, Rushton, Senator Nancy Schaefer, Sharon Burns, Social Workers, Southwest Juvenile Dependency scam, Stolen Baby Info, Susan McPhee, Title IV-E, United States, William Burns
Posted by sdj4djustice on September 6, 2015 in CPS's Abuse of Power Traumatizing Children and Families, Stolen Baby Info, Videos
Tags: abuse of power, addoption help, amanda spratley, American Safe Families Act, Antoine, Antoine Coley, ASFA, Burns., CA, California, CAPTA, CDT, Child, Child abuse, child endangerment, Child protection, Child Protective Service, Child Protective Services, child trafficing, Child Welfare, children, coercion, Conspiracy, corruption, court, Court Cohorts Collaborating and Collecting Kids, cps, CPS and Government corruption, CPS and Government crimes, CPS corruption OUT OF CONTROL, CPS has no ACCOUNTABILITY or OVERSIGHT, crimes, Dan Vinson, Daniel Vinson, dependency, Donnelly, Donnelly Burns, Donnelly Keaton Burns, dpss, evidence, false allegations, falsified documents, falsified evidence, Family, foster care, fostering connections, funding, Government, I need to apologize to some members of my brother's family for using their names as tags on my blog posts I am truly sorry, Investigations & Reports, Its a CHILD WELFARE INDUSTRY, jennie pettet, Jon R, judges, judges. Riverside County., JUDICIARY MALFEASANCE, jurisdiction, Justice, juvenile, Juvenile court, juvenile dependency, Juvenile dependency court, JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT California, kidjacked, kidnapping, Kim Berger, Kim Jasper, Kristin R, Kristine Vernier, law, Lawless America, legal, legally kidnapped, Leslie Ann Hoyle, Leslie Logan, Leslie Raven Mystique, Leslie Rebella, Marla Mahoney, Monterosso, OIG, oski, OUR STORY, parental rights, perjury, Perjury and Falsification of Documents, police, Ratk, Raven Mystique, Research! Law, Riverside County, Rushton, Senator Nancy Schaefer, Sharon Burns, Social Security, social services, Social Work, Social Workers, Southwest Justice Center, Southwest Juvenile Dependency scam, Stolen Baby Info, Susan Loew, Susan McPhee, Temecula, Title IV-E, United States, Videos, Wake up America, We ARE Dedicated to Helping Families Stay Together, welfare, William Burns
Posted by sdj4djustice on August 17, 2015 in CPS's Abuse of Power Traumatizing Children and Families
Tags: abusive social workers, accountability, addoption help, adopt a child, adopt a child from social services, adopt a highway, adoption problems, Adult Protective Services stealing parent's retirement and social security, aging out of the system, American Safe Families Act social security, Antoine Coley, ASFA, Board of Supervisors, Burns., CA social services, CAPTA, CDT, Child, child endangerment, Child protection, Child Protective Service, child trafficing, children bought and sold by the state, christians who hate biological parents for no reason, community hospital, Comprehensive Drug Testing, Conspiracy, corrupt court, corruption, cps, CPS and Government corruption, CPS and Government crimes, CPS corruption OUT OF CONTROL, crimes, Donnelly, Donnelly Burns, Dr. Kim Jasper, Family, fight CPS, fighting CPS, foster youth, fostering families, fostering youth, how can i fight cps, jennie pettet, judges, judges. Riverside County., Juvenile court, juvenile dependency, kidnapping, Kim Berger, Kim Jasper, lawyers who sue cps, legal, local youth groups, Marla Mahoney, Rushton, Senator Nancy Schaefer, Sharon Burns, Social Workers, Southwest Juvenile Dependency scam, Stolen Baby Info, suing cps, Susan Loew, Susan McPhee, thank you cps, Title IV-E, United States, what does social services do, William Burns, youth groups
|sdj4djustice on CPS Toons|
|Jacqueline Galliher on CPS Toons|
|CEEXCEE on Beating CPS, there is hop…|
|Jaiden Thies on Beating CPS, there is hop…|
|CEEXCEE on Beating CPS, there is hop…|
|Rachel Knight on CPS Toons – CPS School P…|
|CEEXCEE on Beating CPS, there is hop…|
|CEEXCEE on Beating CPS, there is hop…|
|Shslby on HERE IS THE EVIDENCE WHY CPS S…|
|Traci on CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES GUID…|
|Jeremy on HERE IS THE EVIDENCE WHY CPS S…|
|Kimberly L Cline on Dear Donnelly|
|Selena Estrella Rese… on Anuual Fatherless Day Rally Ju…|
|Cheryle on The Best Thing You Can Do To G…|
|Peaches on HERE IS THE EVIDENCE WHY CPS S…|